| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cpt Branko
Retired Pirate Club
   |
Posted - 2010.04.22 11:31:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Simon Boon
This is probably an idiotic idea
Yes, it is.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Cpt Branko
Retired Pirate Club
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 13:17:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 22/04/2010 13:17:28
Originally by: Whitehound
It is an interesting idea. However, I would not go as far as to ban it but to have a delay before the warp disruption/scrambling becomes effective, giving low-sec "visitors" an effective chance to escape if they are quick.
Which they now somehow don't have? ^^
Good job on removing unconsensual PVP except gangs sitting on gates with high alpha ships one-volleying stuff.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Cpt Branko
Retired Pirate Club
|
Posted - 2010.04.22 20:44:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Whitehound
Originally by: Cpt Branko
Which they now somehow don't have? ^^
Good job on removing unconsensual PVP except gangs sitting on gates with high alpha ships one-volleying stuff.
Speaking of unconsensual, who is forcing you to understand the topic?
Speaking of trolling, are you sure you noticed this is not CAOD?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Cpt Branko
Retired Pirate Club
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 10:30:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 28/04/2010 10:35:28
I'm still agreeing with the OP that this is a idiotic idea.
It is a mighty fine trollpost however.
Anyone who thinks this change would bring anything but eliminate anything resembling solo or small gang in favour of gangs of sensor boosted artycanes (or artypests/artymaels) one-volleying ships is a clueless, misguided idiot who has no clue about game mechanics whatsoever, or simply trolling.
Originally by: Party Scout
but it would still allow ganking there (some people would escape, so gankers would need MOAR PEOPLE.
Fixed it for you. There are groups which camp gates in large blobs and make for practically instadeath gatecamps. I'm sure they need a boost because they encourage carebears coming to lowsec. 
Originally by: lookatzebirdie
seriously, nobody has even entertained the idea that OP is terribad troll ?
3/10 because you got to page 2 before someone called it 
Actually someone on page 1 said this post is a trololololo, so you're not first.
However, the OP definitely deserves a modestly successfull troll is modestly successfull.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Cpt Branko
Retired Pirate Club
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 22:09:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 28/04/2010 22:09:48
Originally by: Simon Boon
Originally by: Cpt Branko
Anyone who thinks this change would bring anything but eliminate anything resembling solo or small gang in favour of gangs...
This outcome is certainly possible, would this change be made. Solo and small gang warfare should be encouraged, but I'm unsure if a change like this would eliminate it. If your goal was to only kill people, then that's not going to be possible solo or in a small gang, unless the target is stupid, already damaged, or a war target. However, for example, what a small gang could do is drive off the slow, poorly tanked, "sensor boosted artycanes" from the gate camp, allowing a corps industrials access to the system. The goal then becomes control of the gate, rather then the kill mail.
Cool story bro.
I'm really having trouble deciding whether you're simply talking out of ignorance or yoˇ're one of the better trolls in here 
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
| |
|